Barrick Gold Corporation and Kinross Gold are two of the largest gold mining companies in the world. While both organizations primarily focus on gold production, their mining methods and commercial strategies are unique.
Incorporated in 1983, Barrick Gold Company is a Canadian mining business. Canada, the United States, Australia, and the Dominican Republic are among the ten countries in which it operates. In 2020, Barrick produced 4.8 million ounces of gold, making it the largest gold-mining corporation in the world. Barrick also extracts copper and silver with gold.
Founded in 1993, Kinross Gold is another Canadian mining corporation. It conducts business in six nations, including the United States, Brazil, and Russia. In 2020, Kinross produced 2,4 million ounces of gold, making it one of the world’s major gold mining firms.
Barrick Gold has consistently done better financially than Kinross Gold. For example, in 2020, Barrick recorded $12.6 billion in sales and $3.4 billion in net income. Conversely, Kinross recorded $4.2 billion in revenue and $965 million in net income. This disparity in financial performance can be attributable to Barrick’s more extensive asset base and greater diversification.
Don’t miss: Is copper on track for a massive rally?
Barrick has consistently had larger profit margins than Kinross in terms of profitability. In 2020, Barrick’s net profit margin was 27%, and Kinross’ net profit margin was 22%. Due to Barrick’s emphasis on cost reduction and operational efficiency, the business has been able to withstand changes in gold prices.
Barrick Gold and Kinross Gold approach mining differently. Barrick concentrates on large-scale operations and owns several of the world’s largest gold mines. In 2020, the Carlin mine in Nevada, the company’s flagship operation, produced 963,000 ounces of gold. In addition, Barrick runs the Veladero and Pueblo Viejo mines in South America.
Conversely, Kinross has a more diverse asset portfolio, including both large and minor mines. The Paracatu mine in Brazil, which produced 497,000 ounces of gold in 2020, is its largest mine. Moreover, Kinross operates many smaller mines in North America and West Africa.
Read also: What is a lot size in forex?
Large-scale operations have helped Barrick gain economies of scale and cut costs, but they have also increased the company’s exposure to geopolitical and environmental risks. However, this risk is mitigated by Kinross’s more diversified portfolio of assets since the firm is less dependent on any one mine or area.
Both Barrick and Kinross have been accused of their corporate governance methods in the past. For example, in 2012, Barrick faced a shareholder rebellion over CEO compensation and a lack of operational transparency. Since then, the firm has made efforts to enhance its corporate governance processes, including appointing a new CEO and implementing a more transparent remuneration structure.
Another interesting article: 10 trading podcasts to help you stay ahead of the game
Moreover, Kinross has been criticized for its corporate governance policies, notably concerning its West African activities. In 2014, the business was accused of paying bribes to get mining permits in Mauritania and Ghana. Kinross has developed more stringent anti-corruption measures and processes since denying the claims.
Barrick gold stock vs. Kinross gold stock
Barrick Gold and Kinross Gold are publicly traded corporations listed on major stock markets like the New York Stock Exchange and the Toronto Stock Exchange. Accordingly, its stock performance may be impacted by a variety of variables, such as swings in gold prices, geopolitical concerns, and company-specific news and events.
Barrick Gold Corporation 1W chart, source: tradingview.com
Barrick Gold’s stock has historically performed better than Kinross Gold’s. For example, Barrick Gold’s shares had a market capitalization of about $32 billion by the end of Q1 of 20231, whereas Kinross Gold’s was over $5.8 billion.
Kinross Gold Corporation 1W chart, source: tradingview.com
Investors should always undertake their research and analysis before making investing choices, as previous performance does not guarantee future outcomes. In addition, it is essential to remember that investing in stocks has inherent risks, and there are no assurances of favorable results.
Barrick Gold Corporation and Kinross Gold are formidable competitors in the gold mining sector. However, Barrick’s bigger scale, more robust mining strategy, and solid financial performance make it a superior investment. While Kinross’s diverse asset portfolio mitigates some risk, more is needed to match Barrick’s economic performance.
In addition to financial achievement, Barrick’s emphasis on operational efficiency and cost reduction has enabled the business to withstand gold price volatility. This is a crucial factor for investors to consider, as the gold market can be very volatile and vulnerable to considerable price fluctuations.
You may also read: What is a 60/40 investment portfolio?
But, investors should also examine the dangers involved with gold mining business investments. Environmental, social, and geopolitical threats are constantly present in the mining industry. Barrick is more susceptible to these risks because of its bigger size and concentration of activities; hence, investors should carefully examine their risk tolerance before investing in the firm.
Compared to Kinross Gold, Barrick Gold Corporation is the superior investment decision. Barrick’s emphasis on operational efficiency, sound financial performance, and bigger size make it the superior option for investors seeking exposure to gold mining, even though both firms have strengths and drawbacks.
Post has no comment yet.